THE HIGH STREET SHOPPING DIRECTORY ©
All the information you can handle...
why?

THIS MONTH'S FEATURED SHOPPING CATEGORY IS LINGERIE: Our Featured Lingerie Advertiser Is

Henry & June Lingerie
Your private lingerie store...We offer outstanding service (Bizrate Gold), secure shopping (MasterCard Shop Smart), privacy (TrustE) and an unconditional guarantee. Why not play "dress-up" this weekend?

LINGERIE RANGES:
Baby Dolls, Chemises
Bras, Bustiers, Corsets
Hosiery, Garter Belts
Panties
Skirts, Pants
Teddies, Bodysuits
Women's Plus

BRANDS INCLUDE:
Allure Leather
BodyZone
Coquette
Dreamgirl
Dreamgirl Diamond
Dreamguy
Elegant Moments
Ellie Shoes
Exposed
Fantasy Lingerie
GYz
H.O.T.
Inner Vibe
Intimate Attitudes
Leg Avenue
Magic Silk
Pleaser
Risqué
Shirley of Hollywood
Teensy Weensy
Temporary Tattoo Factory
Zakk

CLUB/DANCE
Jumpsuits
Tops with Panties

ACCESSORIES
Boas
Chokers
Garters
Gloves
Vibrators
Whips
Wigs

Click Here For Henry & June Lingerie

Date published: 01.09.08 - not release date

HSE prosecution was a 'waste of taxpayers' money


PRESS INFORMATION - press enquiries to Sam Dabbs on 07711 672893

An unsuccessful six-year campaign by the Health & Safety Executive (HSE) to prosecute a company over an accident in which two of its workers died was a ‘waste of taxpayers money’, according to the company’s lawyer.

Hatton Traffic Management was this week cleared of blame for the accident by a jury at Teesside Crown Court. Steffan Groch, health and safety partner with law firm DWF, said afterwards that the trial should never have gone ahead as the accident was clearly unforeseeable. The jury agreed with our assessment.

The accident took place on the A66 in County Durham in 2002. The men were electrocuted when a mobile tower light they were moving came into contact with overhead power lines. The company was accused of failing to carry out a proper risk assessment, however it argued that it could not have reasonably foreseen the men’s actions.

The case went to the Court of Appeal and the House of Lords, where the HSE argued that employers should be required to take reasonable steps against unforeseeable risks, and that negligent actions by employees were irrelevant as to whether an employer was guilty.

HSE lost in both cases, however it pressed on with the prosecution. After a four-week trial at Teesside Crown Court, the jury found the company not guilty.

DWF partner, Steffan Groch said: “This case was about what was ‘reasonably foreseeable’. HSE’s approach has been misconceived and the jury have confirmed this. HSE closed their minds to evidence that was absolutely fundamental. As a result of this, it falsely raised the families’ expectations of a successful criminal prosecution.

“It’s taken six years and dozens of hearings for this case to be concluded. Despite earlier rulings against HSE in both the Court of Appeal and the House of Lords, it pressed on regardless. The result has been a waste of taxpayers’ money.”


Notes to editors:

DWF LLP is one of the fastest growing regional law firms in the UK. With over 850 people based in Leeds, Liverpool, Manchester and Preston, DWF provides a range of services grouped under the following practice areas:

Corporate
Banking & Finance
Business Recovery
Litigation
Real Estate
People
Insurance
Private Client

DWF has developed extensive sector-specific expertise in a number of areas including: automotive, education, retail & leisure, legal expenses and food and resourcing. Further information on DWF is available via www.dwf.co.uk.

Media enquiries to:

Sam Dabbs
Dabbs PR & Marketing
Phone: 01939 210503 or 07711 672893
E: sam@dabbsprm.com

why?